Comments on: LiewCF.com is Now PR5

By: LiewCF.com

LiewCF.com — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:57:19 +0000

LiewCF.com is PageRank 6!

LiewCF.com is a PageRank 6 website now! The last PageRank upgrade was seven months ago, from PR4 to PR5.

…

By: alan

alan — Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:57:21 +0000

Hi Liew,Congratulation!!! Your site deserves high pagerank.NEWSiness - PR2 Google Vs Yahoo! News - PR4

By: Chi An

Chi An — Sat, 16 Jul 2005 05:15:02 +0000

Not every PR datacenter is updated. You may try future pagerank check at SEOchat.com.

By: farking

farking — Sat, 16 Jul 2005 03:31:10 +0000

mine PR4

By: LcF

LcF — Sat, 16 Jul 2005 03:17:57 +0000

To check Google PageRank, I still recommend to use the official Google toolbar.

By: red

red — Sat, 16 Jul 2005 03:13:50 +0000

i clicked on lcf’s google link for the page rank checkers, they gave different results though. most of them in the first page gave PR 0 for my site which i believe is more to truth lol and two of them gave PR 3 (checkpagerank.com and onlyphp.com). any clue base on what soure did they get PR 3?

By: Chi An

Chi An — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:31:20 +0000

If you have good content, the PR increase != if PR increase, then you have good content.

I didn’t agree that PR is related content. Its just a calculation of quality of links to your websites. It’s a game of link building campaign.

If one day, your article get slashdotted, and lots of people quote your article and link back to your. You get lots of quality links from sites that share the similar theme with yours. Then, in this case, quality contents may help in your page ranking.

In Kahsoon’s case, it just maybe his site have more backward links. (> 600 BL). It doesn’t mean that its quality is better than other site with lower PR.

After all, this is just a game of Google. No one knows when will Google change their algo

By: SapiensBRyan

SapiensBRyan — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 18:15:04 +0000

I think LcF meant that quality content leads to quality linking.

So how do you explain the following?

if good content increases PR, then apparently Kah Soon has better content than me.

By: kahsoon

kahsoon — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:58:26 +0000

T-Boy: lol don’t be jealous…grow up.

By: LcF

LcF — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:42:12 +0000

Yes, Chi An got my point.

By: T-Boy

T-Boy — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:31:35 +0000

LcF: Dude, if good content increases PR, then apparently Kah Soon has better content than me.

Okay, time to slit my wrists now.

By: BankLocater

BankLocater — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:04:11 +0000

My PR is down if you dont include the “www.” in the URI.

By: michelle

michelle — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:29:35 +0000

i got page rank of 4 ! wow.

By: szehau

szehau — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:26:23 +0000

My blog site is still new … PR0

By: colbert

colbert — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:25:41 +0000

yes. the pagerank now shows my site as 6. cool

By: 8dee

8dee — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:07:21 +0000

I got PR3 on my main site and PR5 on my blog. Looks like everyone are getting some high ranking

By: Chi An

Chi An — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:29:36 +0000

I got a 5 too after 2 mth of blogging.
Ya, PR is just result of some formulas regarding quality of linking among the websites. So, linking with websites that share the same themes is important.
I think LcF meant that quality content leads to quality linking.

By: lilian

lilian — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 13:29:00 +0000

Gimme a 5. I woke up this morning and see I am at 5 too. Wonder if Google did something to their ranking? Anyway, thanks for the clarification. I thot I was supposed to be aiming to be No. 1. Hahaha. It shud be 10 hor? (dream on)

By: Bazil

Bazil — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 13:05:15 +0000

Well I am only @ 3, hopefully thats not bad for 2 months work, but like LcF states do not give up!

By: Ahmad Zaki

Ahmad Zaki — Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:07:11 +0000

Mine is still PR0..