<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Vista build-in Windows AntiSpyware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2005/10/microsoft-vista-build-in-windows-antispyware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2005/10/microsoft-vista-build-in-windows-antispyware/</link>
	<description>Tech, Web, How to, Reviews, Tips, Downloads, and Make Money Online</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jlchannel</title>
		<link>http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2005/10/microsoft-vista-build-in-windows-antispyware/#comment-14608</link>
		<dc:creator>jlchannel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liewcf.com/blog/?p=1929#comment-14608</guid>
		<description>said NO to Windows :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>said NO to Windows <img src='http://www.liewcf.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReadyCompanies</title>
		<link>http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2005/10/microsoft-vista-build-in-windows-antispyware/#comment-14596</link>
		<dc:creator>ReadyCompanies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 04:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liewcf.com/blog/?p=1929#comment-14596</guid>
		<description>hi 
i have tried the earlier version of Microsoft AntiSpyware - not so reliable

better still are the Ad Aware and Spybot - also free</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
i have tried the earlier version of Microsoft AntiSpyware - not so reliable</p>
<p>better still are the Ad Aware and Spybot - also free</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tien Soon</title>
		<link>http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2005/10/microsoft-vista-build-in-windows-antispyware/#comment-14589</link>
		<dc:creator>Tien Soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liewcf.com/blog/?p=1929#comment-14589</guid>
		<description>LoL.. Windows XP N marketed without bundling Windows Media Player. What's next? Windows Vista S for a version without AntiSpyware? haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LoL.. Windows XP N marketed without bundling Windows Media Player. What&#8217;s next? Windows Vista S for a version without AntiSpyware? haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LcF</title>
		<link>http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2005/10/microsoft-vista-build-in-windows-antispyware/#comment-14588</link>
		<dc:creator>LcF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 03:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liewcf.com/blog/?p=1929#comment-14588</guid>
		<description>not a problem. Microsoft will release a Windows Vista without AntiSpyware version if (and only if) lose in anti-trust suit. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not a problem. Microsoft will release a Windows Vista without AntiSpyware version if (and only if) lose in anti-trust suit. <img src='http://www.liewcf.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tien Soon</title>
		<link>http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2005/10/microsoft-vista-build-in-windows-antispyware/#comment-14586</link>
		<dc:creator>Tien Soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liewcf.com/blog/?p=1929#comment-14586</guid>
		<description>With the bundling AntiSpyware ended up in another anti-trust suit? The possibility is undeniably there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the bundling AntiSpyware ended up in another anti-trust suit? The possibility is undeniably there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
