Comments on: Google, Picasa for Mac? http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/ Tech, Web, How to, Reviews, Tips, Downloads, and Make Money Online Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:37:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Alex http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-305891 Alex Sun, 11 May 2008 01:56:38 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-305891 The easiest way to get picasa on a mac is to use wine. Install X11 from the mac install disk. Install macports then 'sudo /opt/local/bin/port install wine' download picasa for windows and install it how you would otherwise with wine! The easiest way to get picasa on a mac is to use wine.
Install X11 from the mac install disk.
Install macports
then ’sudo /opt/local/bin/port install wine’
download picasa for windows and install it how you would otherwise with wine!

]]> By: Kathleen http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-301723 Kathleen Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:59:11 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-301723 I am with Ben! Same EXACT situation! I love Picasa so much, that I just bought Parallels...but I am having the hardest time getting Parallels installed on my mac. The directions are horrible, and the support is only through email, unless you want to pay $30 a call. Then the email techs only respond once a day! I have been working on the installation for 5 days now and still it is not complete. I am terrified that once I get parallels installed, that it will still not run Picasa. Does anyone know if it will? I appreciate any help! I am with Ben! Same EXACT situation! I love Picasa so much, that I just bought Parallels…but I am having the hardest time getting Parallels installed on my mac. The directions are horrible, and the support is only through email, unless you want to pay $30 a call. Then the email techs only respond once a day! I have been working on the installation for 5 days now and still it is not complete. I am terrified that once I get parallels installed, that it will still not run Picasa. Does anyone know if it will? I appreciate any help!

]]> By: david http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-301463 david Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:56:32 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-301463 Picasa for Mac is allegedly coming out 2008: http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/15/exclusive-google-developing-mac-version-of-picasa-due-to-be-released-this-year/ :) Picasa for Mac is allegedly coming out 2008:

http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/15/exclusive-google-developing-mac-version-of-picasa-due-to-be-released-this-year/

:)

]]> By: dep http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-297534 dep Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:59:36 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-297534 I have to imagine that Picasa for Mac is *right* around the corner. Seems strange that there is even a linux version but no mac version, especially given how "multimedia-centered" mac laptops seem to be. You know they're chugging away on it as we speak. I have to imagine that Picasa for Mac is *right* around the corner. Seems strange that there is even a linux version but no mac version, especially given how “multimedia-centered” mac laptops seem to be.

You know they’re chugging away on it as we speak.

]]> By: ben http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-295465 ben Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:13:21 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-295465 I have been a Windows user since 3.1 days. I found Picasa a few years ago and I can't praise it enough. I got a MacBook Pro last Christmas and the transition has been super easy. BUT, the ONLY program I miss deeply is Picasa. I used to think Picasa was an iPhoto clone and I was excited to see what iPhoto was all about; I was sorely disappointed. There are some huge things that make Picasa #1 in my book. 1. Lightning fast - I have over 15,000 6+ mega pixel photos and I am just amazed at how fast it sorts, scrolls, filters, searches, etc. 2. Watch Folders - Leaves everything in it's place, wherever you want it. You can kind of do this with iPhoto but is a pain. It also handles folders going away or being added very gracefully. Like I said I have a Mac laptop and I really don't want to store my 40+GB of photos on my 80 GB drive. I have all my photos on an external drive and I recently reformatted and installed Windows. When I reinstalled Picasa and pointed it back to the watch folder there were all my pictures, tags, notes, edits, etc. It was amazing. 3. Nondestructive edit - All changes are kept in an ini file, you can always undo back to the original. Yes, iPhoto does this too but it makes a copy of the original and hides it somewhere deep in the file system (see #2). 4. Seamless integration with Gmail - super easy to resize and send. (okay, I think iPhoto is close here, but not with Gmail :)) 5. Export - It is amazingly easy to export a subset of pictures based on a search, star, tag, etc. This export can be auto resized and put wherever you want. Great for digital photo frames, CD slide-shows, etc. I spent like an hour trying to do this in iPhoto and kept getting driven to .Mac. NO I DON"T WANT A .MAC ACCOUNT! 6. Import - I know iPhoto has a decent import function, but Picasa's is very intuitive and it simply creates a folder at a defined location with the same name as the album. This makes it very easy to find manually if you have to. There are other subtleties, but these are the main points that break the deal on iPhoto. Notice that I didn't list Free as a benefit. Yes, it is nice that Picasa is free, but I would be more than willing to pay for it. I am on the verge of buying Parallels and a copy of Windows just to run the damn thing on the Mac. Yes, to me Picasa is almost worth the $150+ it would cost to do that. I have been a Windows user since 3.1 days. I found Picasa a few years ago and I can’t praise it enough. I got a MacBook Pro last Christmas and the transition has been super easy. BUT, the ONLY program I miss deeply is Picasa. I used to think Picasa was an iPhoto clone and I was excited to see what iPhoto was all about; I was sorely disappointed. There are some huge things that make Picasa #1 in my book.

1. Lightning fast - I have over 15,000 6+ mega pixel photos and I am just amazed at how fast it sorts, scrolls, filters, searches, etc.

2. Watch Folders - Leaves everything in it’s place, wherever you want it. You can kind of do this with iPhoto but is a pain. It also handles folders going away or being added very gracefully. Like I said I have a Mac laptop and I really don’t want to store my 40+GB of photos on my 80 GB drive. I have all my photos on an external drive and I recently reformatted and installed Windows. When I reinstalled Picasa and pointed it back to the watch folder there were all my pictures, tags, notes, edits, etc. It was amazing.

3. Nondestructive edit - All changes are kept in an ini file, you can always undo back to the original. Yes, iPhoto does this too but it makes a copy of the original and hides it somewhere deep in the file system (see #2).

4. Seamless integration with Gmail - super easy to resize and send. (okay, I think iPhoto is close here, but not with Gmail :))

5. Export - It is amazingly easy to export a subset of pictures based on a search, star, tag, etc. This export can be auto resized and put wherever you want. Great for digital photo frames, CD slide-shows, etc. I spent like an hour trying to do this in iPhoto and kept getting driven to .Mac. NO I DON”T WANT A .MAC ACCOUNT!

6. Import - I know iPhoto has a decent import function, but Picasa’s is very intuitive and it simply creates a folder at a defined location with the same name as the album. This makes it very easy to find manually if you have to.

There are other subtleties, but these are the main points that break the deal on iPhoto. Notice that I didn’t list Free as a benefit. Yes, it is nice that Picasa is free, but I would be more than willing to pay for it. I am on the verge of buying Parallels and a copy of Windows just to run the damn thing on the Mac. Yes, to me Picasa is almost worth the $150+ it would cost to do that.

]]> By: wong http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293960 wong Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:28:36 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293960 I hate iPhoto for taking too much of the hard disk and lot of memory... But this Picasa require iPhoto... Shit~~~~ I hate iPhoto for taking too much of the hard disk and lot of memory… But this Picasa require iPhoto… Shit~~~~

]]> By: Nicholas http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293958 Nicholas Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:49:57 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293958 Hello, I use the Picasa on my Windows and I love it. Since you have Mac, why not get yourself the new iLife? I not a Mac user, but I always wanted to use the iPhoto, so far Picasa is the nearest proram that looks and work like iPhoto. I don't really know, so far I know that there is a new iLife and iPhoto in it is new too =) Hello, I use the Picasa on my Windows and I love it. Since you have Mac, why not get yourself the new iLife? I not a Mac user, but I always wanted to use the iPhoto, so far Picasa is the nearest proram that looks and work like iPhoto. I don’t really know, so far I know that there is a new iLife and iPhoto in it is new too =)

]]> By: kew http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293950 kew Tue, 04 Sep 2007 04:27:30 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293950 why not upgrade to iLife 08 for $79..... why not upgrade to iLife 08 for $79…..

]]> By: Paul Tan http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293922 Paul Tan Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:10:15 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293922 use iphotobuddy to separate your iphoto libraries. this should make iphoto run faster use iphotobuddy to separate your iphoto libraries. this should make iphoto run faster

]]> By: LcF http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293919 LcF Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:39:26 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293919 @Weilian: thanks for the tip. I forgot the software come with canon camera. however, they look ugly.. @Weilian: thanks for the tip. I forgot the software come with canon camera. however, they look ugly..

]]> By: Jake http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293916 Jake Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:36:54 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293916 Well in theory you should be able to compile Linux programs on Mac with enough work, but since Google didn't release the source code I guess it isn't possible. On Linux I use digiKam myself. It's a nice app. Well in theory you should be able to compile Linux programs on Mac with enough work, but since Google didn’t release the source code I guess it isn’t possible. On Linux I use digiKam myself. It’s a nice app.

]]> By: Weilian http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293914 Weilian Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:30:06 +0000 http://www.liewcf.com/blog/archives/2007/09/google-picasa-for-mac/#comment-293914 Er... Mac does not support ZoomBrowser that comes with your Canon? Or those iPhoto and Picasa have special utilities? Er… Mac does not support ZoomBrowser that comes with your Canon? Or those iPhoto and Picasa have special utilities?

]]>